Infantry Weapons Section

Mina - explosive projectile

It describes the Mines

Automatic - Manual individual small automatic weapons, intended for continuous or a combination of fire.

It describes the Kalashnikov

Rifle - hand-cut, small arms, with a barrel length of about 70 caliber.

It describes Rifles

14 comment (s) to "section of infantry weapons"

LOKKI on January 7th, 2008 6:58 am. Comments left: 4
Stsuko! - And the weapons of infantry? Stsuko places PTUR? Automatic rifles, stsuko - machine guns, grenade-stsuko where stsuko grenades? Where do anything except partizanschiny?
[Write a reply to this comment]
Basil on May 2nd, 2008 9:39 pm. Leave comments: 2
The basic infantry weapon does is automatic. Among there were only sniper rifles. And no grenades, no infantryman does not cost.
[Write a reply to this comment]
Nicholas on May 3rd, 2008 4:09 pm. Leave comments: 6
We must make a separate section on machines and rifles, their types, modifications. To be able to learn about the most, not only of the "Kalash". Enter a section of small arms from other countries, such as the M16, Steyr AUG, Galil, and others.
[Write a reply to this comment]
Oleg on May 11th, 2008 2:27 pm. Leave comments: 3
I agree, you need to talk not only of Russian weapons, but also of foreign analogs. Of course our weapons is in the first place, but it is not all over the world (all except NATO).
[Write a reply to this comment]
Nicholas on May 11th, 2008 3:05 pm. Leave comments: 6
Yes, our arms the whole world knows, even on the arms of Mozambique shows the Kalashnikov rifle. Yes, and in general all types of weapons (well, except maybe the law of the sea) are known everywhere, particularly in Asia and South America.
[Write a reply to this comment]
Dmitry on May 11th, 2008 3:24 pm. Leave comments: 8
Mmmm ... Yes, a visit should be supplemented by a list of infantry weapons. If we judge by the list, then a modern fighter is armed with Soviet soldier worse the Great Patriotic War.
[Write a reply to this comment]
999max999 on May 30th, 2008 9:32 pm. Leave comments: 2
To be honest some infantry section weapons bednovat. Even the category of personal hand infantry weapons has greatly increased the number of positions, not to mention that the weapon can be considered as infantry and fire support.
[Write a reply to this comment]
Sergey on May 30th, 2008 11:42 pm. Leave comments: 15
Yes, the infantry section weapons well too poor. Moreover, it seems to me that it would be a good idea to pay attention to the modern perspective weapons programs. In fact, there are a lot of very interesting developments. I hope that in the near future, the situation has changed dramatically.
[Write a reply to this comment]
999max999 on May 31st, 2008 1:27 pm. Leave comments: 2
Interesting, but how "Abakan" hit the Kalashnikov assault rifles, as far as I know the author is Nikonov. By the same token, and internal structure are very different, "Abakan" even surpasses "Kalash" on all indicators, except for cost.
[Write a reply to this comment]
degrees on June 1st, 2008 5:06 pm. Leave comments: 1
Abakanustupaet knockdown ability of the shot, всетаки a new cartridge is 5.45 not 7.62 as previously, and bursts of fire regime Hardly much to remedy the situation
[Write a reply to this comment]
Kinger on October 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm. Leave comments: 2
Sniper weapons, you can make a separate section, but as carbines.
[Write a reply to this comment]
Eugene on October 12th, 2008 12:43 am. Leave comments: 2
I have a lot of information about weapons of infantry. Basically tehharakteristiki. I can insert a description.
[Write a reply to this comment]
Perfil on October 27th, 2008 2:33 am. Comments left: 4
Little little, very little! We must supplement gaps in the Russian arms!
[Write a reply to this comment]
Ki55y on November 29th, 2008 6:06 pm. Leave comments: 1
Yes маловато but vprintsypi normally have something to read and watch. and that the site also has so normalnenky have to do that. I liked it! класно
[Write a reply to this comment]